Home
    About the Center
    Physical Activity
    Resources and Bibliography
    Aging Network
    Features
    Long Term Care Institute
    Contact Us
    Subscribe to NAN
 
Nutritional screening of older people in a sub-acute care facility in Australia and its relation to discharge outcomes
  Objectives: to determine the prevalence of under-nutrition using brief screening methods and to determine the relation between these results and (1) those of a more standard nutritional assessment and (2) discharge outcomes. Design: prospective study. Subjects: 65 (21 males) patients older than 65 years. Setting: sub-acute care facility. Measurements: the Mini Nutritional Assessment, standard nutritional assessment, ‘rapid screen’ and discharge outcome. Results: the prevalence of under-nutrition was high, ranging from 35.4% to 43.1%, depending on the screening method used. Compared to the standard nutritional assessment the ‘rapid screen’ consisting of (1) body mass index <22 kg/m2; and/or (2) reported weight loss of > 7.5% over the previous 3 months and the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (atrisk subjects (46% of total) further evaluated using standard nutritional assessment) had sensitivities of 78.6 and 89.5% and speciWcities of 97.3 and 87.5% respectively in diagnosing under-nutrition. Under-nourished patients as identiWed by the standard nutritional assessment (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017), the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017) and the rapid screen (56.5% (under-nourished) versus 21.4% (nourished); P =0.004) were more likely to be discharged to an acute hospital or an accommodation with increased support (poor discharge outcomes) than nourished patients. Conclusion: all screening methods identiWed patients more likely to have a poor discharge outcome. The highly speciWc but less sensitive ‘rapid screen’ may be the best method in facilities with limited resources as it can be easily incorporated into nursing/medical admissions and avoids biochemical investigations in all patients. The more sensitive two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment is better if resources permit.
   
Type Journal - Bibliographic Record
Resource Type
(If applicable)
Author(s) RENUKA VISVANATHAN, ROBERT PENHALL, IAN CHAPMAN
Book Publisher
Journal Publisher Age Ageing
Year 2004
Pages 260-265
Article Title
Edition V 33
Contact Information
(If applicable)
Comments
(If applicable)
 
     »  Search Resource Center
       Type Keyword:

National Resource Center on Nutrition, Physical Activity & Aging
| Florida International University, OE 200, Miami, FL 33199
Phone: 305-348-1517 | Fax: 305-348-1518 | E-mail: nutrionandaging@fiu.edu


This website is supported, in part, by a grant from the Administration on Aging, Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS). Grantees undertaking projects under government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their
findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, reflect official DHHS policy.